<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Break &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cotellese.net/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cotellese.net</link>
	<description>Random thoughts by a technology junkie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>YouTube is Dead &#8211; Maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.cotellese.net/2009/06/16/youtube-is-dead-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cotellese.net/2009/06/16/youtube-is-dead-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cotellese.net/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benjamin Wayne, CEO of Fliqz, a white label video streaming  service has lit up the blogosphere with his prognosis that YouTube is doomed and is currently on life support.
His opinion was based on a recent Credit Suisse report shed some light on how much money Google is using on YouTube and he believes that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/benjamin-wayne/4/843/b11">Benjamin Wayne</a>, CEO of <a href="http://www.fliqz.com/">Fliqz</a>, a white label video streaming  service has lit up the blogosphere with his prognosis that <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/is-youtube-doomed-2009-4">YouTube is doomed and is currently on life support</a>.</p>
<p>His opinion was based on a recent Credit Suisse report shed some light on how much money Google is using on YouTube and he believes that the search engine giant won&#8217;t continue to hemorrhage money indefinitely.</p>
<p>I find this interesting given the recent announcements about the ease through which the new iPhone 3GS and other devices can <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/iphone-3g-s/video-recording.html">post content directly to YouTube</a>. It would seem that because of the high operating costs of streaming video and the challenges of monetizing it, YouTube will become consumed by it&#8217;s own success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cotellese.net/2009/06/16/youtube-is-dead-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warner Music CEO admits some blame for the rise of P2P file sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/11/19/warner-music-ceo-admits-some-blame-for-the-rise-of-p2p-file-sharing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/11/19/warner-music-ceo-admits-some-blame-for-the-rise-of-p2p-file-sharing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joecotellese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cotellese.net/2007/11/19/warner-music-ceo-admits-some-blame-for-the-rise-of-p2p-file-sharing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edgar Bronfman, CEO of the Warner Music Group, has publicly framed the music industry&#8217;s failure to accommodate file-sharing as an &#8216;inadvertent&#8217; war on consumers. I&#8217;m left wondering how you can file a series of lawsuits inadvertently. &#8216;We expected our business would remain blissfully unaffected even as the world of interactivity, constant connection and file sharing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edgar Bronfman, CEO of the Warner Music Group, has <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/macuser/news/138990/music-boss-we-were-wrong-to-go-to-war-with-consumers.html">publicly framed the music industry&#8217;s failure to accommodate file-sharing as an &#8216;inadvertent&#8217; war on consumers</a>. I&#8217;m left wondering how you can file a series of lawsuits inadvertently. &#8216;We expected our business would remain blissfully unaffected even as the world of interactivity, constant connection and file sharing was exploding &#8230; By &#8230; moving at a glacial pace, we inadvertently went to war with consumers by denying them what they wanted and could otherwise find and as a result of course, consumers won.</p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/11/19/warner-music-ceo-admits-some-blame-for-the-rise-of-p2p-file-sharing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIAA Hits a Sour Note With Its File-Sharing Witch Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/10/11/riaa-hits-a-sour-note-with-its-file-sharing-witch-hunt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/10/11/riaa-hits-a-sour-note-with-its-file-sharing-witch-hunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joecotellese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cotellese.net/2007/10/11/riaa-hits-a-sour-note-with-its-file-sharing-witch-hunt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIAA Hits a Sour Note With Its File-Sharing Witch Hunt 
If I were a big-shot L.A. music mogul, Jammie Thomas would not be my ideal poster child as the face of illegal file sharing.
Thomas, you&#8217;ll recall, was convicted last week in a Duluth, Minnesota, court for violating copyright law by making a couple of dozen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/commentary/theluddite/2007/10/luddite_1011" >RIAA Hits a Sour Note With Its File-Sharing Witch Hunt</a> </p>
<blockquote><p>If I were a big-shot L.A. music mogul, Jammie Thomas would not be my ideal poster child as the face of illegal file sharing.</p>
<p>Thomas, you&#8217;ll recall, was convicted last week in a Duluth, Minnesota, court for violating copyright law by making a couple of dozen songs available to the multitudes. For this she was ordered to pay the recording industry $222,000 in damages, and she could lose even more to court costs and appeals.</p>
<p>All because she was among the 26,000 people sued by those Brioni suits known collectively as the Recording Industry Association of America, and hers was the first case to actually reach trial. The RIAA, faced with plummeting CD sales and increasingly restive artists, wanted to &#8220;send a message&#8221; to all the lowlifes out there who download music for free and undercut their profit margins.</p>
<p>The message, apparently, is this: &#8220;We&#8217;re idiots.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/RIAA" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Music" rel="tag"> Music</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/file+sharing" rel="tag"> file sharing</a></p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/10/11/riaa-hits-a-sour-note-with-its-file-sharing-witch-hunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC Universal &#8211; Fails Basic Math</title>
		<link>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/09/04/nbc-universal-fails-basic-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/09/04/nbc-universal-fails-basic-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joecotellese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cotellese.net/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a recent spat between Apple and NBC Universal over pricing TV shows on the iTunes Music Store (iTMS). The net result is Apple is no longer offering NBC Universal programming on the iTunes Music Store.
Centered around the argument was the desire for NBC Universal to charge consumers 4.99 per episode of popular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a recent spat between Apple and NBC Universal over pricing TV shows on the iTunes Music Store (iTMS). The net result is Apple is no longer offering NBC Universal programming on the iTunes Music Store.</p>
<p>Centered around the argument was the desire for NBC Universal to charge consumers <em>4.99</em> <em>per episode</em> of popular content. After reading that, I began to do some investigating of popular NBC Universal DVD box sets. Here&#8217;s what I came up with.</p>
<p><strong>Heros Season 1</strong><br />
39.99 / 23 episodes = 1.73 per episode</p>
<p><strong>The Office Season 3</strong><br />
31.99 / 24 episodes  = 1.33 per episode</p>
<p><strong>30 Rock Season 1</strong><br />
32.49 / 21 episodes = 1.54 per episode</p>
<p>and the most expensive example I found</p>
<p><strong>Battlestar Galactica Season 2</strong><br />
51.99 / 20 episodes =  2.59 per episode</p>
<p>Based on their pricing model, the Battlestar Galactica box set would cost $100. Why would they care to raise prices to the point that no one would buy their content? I can think of only two reasons.</p>
<p>They are starting their own online service. While this is certainly not necessarily a bad idea, spending the money to create a competing service is ultimately going to fail. Like it or not, the iPod and the iTMS is the premier content delivery platform. For any competing platform to be successful they will need to have a smooth process for allowing downloads to an iPod. The only way they could possibly compete in this space is if they offered DRM free shows (which they won&#8217;t).</p>
<p>They want to minimize individual unit sales and drive DVD box set sales. I&#8217;m less inclines to believe this but this is only based on my experience. With the advent of DVD rental services and now digital delivery, I&#8217;m less inclined to want to take up valuable real estate in my house to contain walls of DVDs. The physical disk really has limited value.</p>
<p>Content providers have to get over the fact that with the competition for eyeballs from multiple sources, their content <strong>is not worth very much</strong>. I predict that while NBC Universal will be back on iTMS either by the end of this season or the beginning of next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/09/04/nbc-universal-fails-basic-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News Lies protected by Free Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/08/02/fox-news-lies-protected-by-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/08/02/fox-news-lies-protected-by-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joecotellese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cotellese.net/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From DailyKOS 
In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.
Lawyers paid by Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s bosses argued in court that Fox can lie with impunity.
It&#8217;s their right under the 1st Ammendment.
This suit was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/7/30/201231/262">From DailyKOS </a></p>
<blockquote><p>In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that <a href="http://www.projectcensored.org/publications/2005/11.html" target="_blank">there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lawyers paid by Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s bosses argued in court that Fox can lie with impunity.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s their right under the 1st Ammendment.</p>
<p>This suit was brought about because of a couple of &#8220;Investigative&#8221; journalists hired by a local Fox affiliate refused to insert false statements into their news piece to placate the programs producers. When they were fired for not changing the story, they sued Fox News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/08/02/fox-news-lies-protected-by-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TiVo HD is ready to go &#8211; $299 Sweet.</title>
		<link>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/07/24/tivo-hd-is-ready-to-go-299-sweet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/07/24/tivo-hd-is-ready-to-go-299-sweet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joecotellese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cotellese.net/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I now finally have an excuse to get an HDTV and HD Cable/FIOS. TiVo HD gets official: $299, loaded, with SATA and TTG coming
I am addicted to my TiVo and hate watching TV without it. When Verizon called offering FIOS service I turned them down because I couldn&#8217;t easily use my Tivo. If this thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now finally have an excuse to get an HDTV and HD Cable/FIOS. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070724-tivo-hd-series3-lite-gets-official.html">TiVo HD gets official: $299, loaded, with SATA and TTG coming</a></p>
<p>I am addicted to my TiVo and hate watching TV without it. When Verizon called offering FIOS service I turned them down because I couldn&#8217;t easily use my Tivo. If this thing can work with Digital Cable/FIOS then I&#8217;m all over it.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/tivo" rel="tag">tivo</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/video" rel="tag">video</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/hd" rel="tag">hd</a></p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cotellese.net/2007/07/24/tivo-hd-is-ready-to-go-299-sweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
